See the corpus behind every AI answer.
Map the pages AI cites, compare them with your owned content, and find the coverage, vocabulary, page-health, and access gaps that can keep your strongest evidence out of the answer.
Sources
See which domains and pages shape the answers in the current benchmark.
Know whose evidence is shaping the answer.
A source count cannot tell you whether AI is learning from your site, a competitor, or an independent authority. KnitKnot preserves the page and the answer context behind every captured citation.
Owned sources
See which of your registered domains and pages enter the citation set, by topic and captured answer.
Competitor sources
Find the rival pages that repeatedly support competitive recommendations or crowd out your evidence.
Third-party sources
Separate independent coverage from company-controlled content and inspect the surrounding co-citation pattern.
Audit your site with the same ruler.
Registered company domains become a canonical page inventory. Each readable page is fetched, text-extracted, classified, analyzed, and compared with the cited corpus.
One GEO score, with an honest gate
The 0-100 diagnostic combines answer position, chunkability, extractable facts, evidence, formats, freshness, entity clarity, relevant schema, and accessibility. A PDF, JavaScript-only shell, or search-crawler block is shown as a readability problem instead of being averaged into a misleading score.
Page type and depth matter
A homepage, comparison page, product page, and deep guide should not be judged as interchangeable content. Page-fit logic keeps the diagnosis and recommended action aligned with the job of the page.
Find the page, depth, and vocabulary gaps behind the loss.
KnitKnot connects topic demand, owned-page coverage, and the pages already earning citations so a content gap becomes a specific decision.
Coverage composition
Compare owned page count and depth with the demand share behind products, features, personas, topics, and strategic content types.
Retrieval vocabulary
See the terms that recur on cited winners but remain absent from your owned pages, with the cited documents that support the gap.
Pages to Beat
Prioritize priced topics where a competitor page holds the citation slot, then revise an existing page or create the missing coverage.
Vocabulary from cited pages is retrieval evidence, not access to an engine's private search queries. Topic assignment and demand evidence are inputs to diagnosis, not a promise of citation.
Separate content quality from content invisibility.
A strong page cannot compete through a retrieval path that cannot read it. KnitKnot checks the access conditions without turning them into ranking guarantees.
Crawler roles
Training, search-index, and user-triggered bots are reported separately.
Sitemaps
Presence, parseability, URL coverage, and available freshness signals.
Snippet rules
noindex, nosnippet, and restrictive max-snippet directives on captured pages.
Organization schema
Whether the homepage exposes the relevant machine-readable entity markup.
llms.txt
Presence and parseability, reported as informational rather than a ranking factor.
Robots.txt states a site's rules; it does not prove that every crawler obeys them. Unblocking access can make a page eligible for retrieval, but it cannot guarantee selection or citation.
Carry the evidence into the work.
Source and content findings do not end in an audit export. They become persistent Issues and grounded Playbooks with the page, evidence, and measurable hypothesis attached.
Content and source intelligence FAQ
See what is shaping your AI presence.
Benchmark the answers, inspect the cited corpus, and find the content gaps worth fixing first.